coeducational) ? dos (college student sex: men versus. female) ANCOVAs have been used towards sex salience, part of almost every other-intercourse best friends, full combined-gender stress and also the around three stress subscales (find Table eight). All result variables got skewness (between .0cuatro0 to just one.2step 35) and you will kurtosis (between .488 so you can .670) that have been within this acceptable ranges . New projected limited mode and you may basic problems of your own result details receive in Table 8 (correlations one of many data details is displayed during the Desk Elizabeth in S1 Document). The new ANOVA efficiency without covariates have been in Desk F for the S1 File. Mediation analyses was in fact presented to explore whether college or university variations in combined-intercourse anxiety were mediated of the blended-sex relationships and you can/or sex salience. Most of the analyses controlled to possess adult money, adult studies, quantity of brothers, amount of sisters, school banding, the four proportions of sexual orientation, professors, and you will college student decades; this new analyses for the blended-sex nervousness plus regulated having social nervousness.
In contrast to Study 1, there were no main effects of school type or student gender and no interaction effects on gender salience. Therefore, H1 was not supported.
There was a main effect of school type, with coeducational school students reporting a larger percentage of other-gender close friends than single-sex school students, p < .001, d = .47, supporting H2. There was also a main effect of student gender, with male students reporting a larger percentage of other-gender close friends than female students (p = .005, d = .27). Consistent with H4, there was no interaction effect with student gender.
Single-sex school students reported higher levels of total mixed-gender anxiety (p = .009, d = .25), Social Distress in Dating (p = .007, d = .26), and Social Distress in Mixed-gender Groups (p = .007, d = .26) than coeducational school students. There was no main effect of school in Fear of Negative Evaluation. Therefore, H3 was largely supported. Male students reported www.datingranking.net/iamnaughty-review higher levels of total mixed-gender anxiety (p = .020, d = .22) and Fear of Negative Evaluation (p = .008, d = .25) than female students. There were no main effects of student gender in Social Distress in Dating and Social Distress in Mixed-gender Groups. Consistent with H4, there were no interaction effects with student gender in all forms of mixed-gender anxiety.
Comparing across the two samples, the differences between single-sex school students and coeducational school students were more pronounced in the high school sample, supporting H5. For example, gender salience and fear of negative evaluation differed between single-sex and coeducational school students only in the high school sample.
I then used a few “College style of (single-gender compared to. coeducational) ? Beginner intercourse (men against. female) ? College or university season (first year vs. non-first year)” ANCOVAs into university attempt (get a hold of Table G inside the supplementary material) to check on for potential college or university seasons outcomes. Efficiency demonstrated no chief effectation of college seasons otherwise people interaction involving university year.
As in Study 1, mediation analyses were conducted using PROCESS with 10,000 bootstrap samples and the same mediation model, except that for Study 2, the covariates were parental income, parental education, number of brothers, number of sisters, school banding, the four dimensions of sexual orientation, faculty, student age, and social anxiety. Each form of mixed-gender anxiety was analyzed separately (see Table 9). Percentage of other-gender close friends mediated the school differences in total mixed-gender anxiety, Social Distress in Dating, and Social Distress in Mixed-gender Groups, but not Fear of Negative Evaluation. Thus, H7 was partially supported. As in Study 1, there were no significant indirect effects of gender salience on either total or any particular form of mixed-gender anxiety. Alternative mediation models were also conducted (see Figure A in S1 File for the generic alternative mediation model and Table H for the results). Results showed significant indirect effects of total mixed-gender anxiety, Social Distress in Dating and Social Distress in Mixed-gender Groups on the percentage of other-gender close friends.
